Articles about ‘deinstitutionalization’

As of August 1, 2022, bakerlaw has joined forces with Ross & McBride LLP.

Our team is excited to become part of the formidable group of human rights, employment, and constitutional lawyers at Ross & McBride. Our current and future clients will continue to receive the personalized, high-quality representation that has become synonymous with bakerlaw, and will benefit from the collaborative, cross-functional approach to complex issues that both we and Ross & McBride value. With the added resources of larger, full-service firm, this collaboration will allow us to take on new clients for the first time since October 2021. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact us at contact@rossmcbride.com

The content on this page is no longer being updated here. For news and updated content you can find it on the Ross & McBride News page.


Institutionalization as a Form of Discrimination

  • September 6, 2016
  • BakerLaw
  • Comments Off on Institutionalization as a Form of Discrimination

Bakerlaw recently helped our client, Audrey Cole settle her son’s case against the Ontario government. Her son Ian has developmental disabilities and requires extensive homecare support which exceeded the regulatory caps. Thankfully, Audrey was able to fund the additional care Ian required above the cap through donations and private insurance thus preventing him from needing to be institutionalized. » Read the rest

Fighting for the Right to Live in the Community

  • July 11, 2016
  • BakerLaw
  • Comments Off on Fighting for the Right to Live in the Community

Bakerlaw’s David Baker and Emily Shepard finished up the first week of hearing in Kingston. The case centres on the idea that persons with disabilities should have the right to live and receive care in the community if they chose to, rather than be forced to live in an institution. » Read the rest

“Community Care at Heart of Human Rights Case”

  • July 6, 2016
  • BakerLaw
  • Comments Off on “Community Care at Heart of Human Rights Case”

“Community Care at Heart of Human Rights Case” was the headline on Whig Standard’s story written by Ronald Zajac yesterday. His article (link) describes bakerlaw’s current case against the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. To learn more about the case, you can read our earlier blog post here (link), here (link), or here (link). » Read the rest

Day 1: “Ian would die” if institutionalized

  • July 6, 2016
  • BakerLaw
  • Comments Off on Day 1: “Ian would die” if institutionalized

Bakerlaw’s David Baker and Emily Shepard delivered opening statements and began the testimony of our client’s mother yesterday in Kingston. They are arguing that the unnecessary institutionalization of a person with disabilities is discriminatory. To learn more about the case check out our earlier blog posts here (link) and  here (link). » Read the rest

Institutionalization as a form of Discrimination

  • July 4, 2016
  • BakerLaw
  • Comments Off on Institutionalization as a form of Discrimination

Bakerlaw’s David Baker and Emily Shepard are gearing up for a big case wherein they will argue that institutionalization is a form of discrimination. In the US, in a case called Olmstead, the court held that institutionalizing a person when the care they require could be delivered in the community is discriminatory. » Read the rest

One Step Closer to Deinstitutionalization

  • October 14, 2015
  • BakerLaw
  • Comments Off on One Step Closer to Deinstitutionalization

Bakerlaw has been working to import the “Olmstead principle” into Canadian human rights law (for an earlier post on the issue click here (link to post). In the Olmstead case, a U.S. court held that it was discriminatory to place people in institutions when they could receive the care they required in the community (for more information read the Olmstead case here (link to case) or visit the Bazelon Centre website (link to website)). » Read the rest