Update: Charities can sponsor Test Case litigation

  • August 21, 2018
  • Laura Lepine

As of August 1, 2022, bakerlaw has joined forces with Ross & McBride LLP.
Our team is excited to become part of the formidable group of human rights, employment, and constitutional lawyers at Ross &smp; McBride. Our current and future clients will continue to receive the personalized, high-quality representation that has become synonymous with bakerlaw, and will benefit from the collaborative, cross-functional approach to complex issues that both we and Ross & McBride value. With the added resources of larger, full-service firm, this collaboration will allow us to take on new clients for the first time since October 2021. If you are seeking legal advice, please contact us at contact@rossmcbride.com.

The content on this page is no longer being updated here. For news and updated content you can find it on the Ross & McBride News page.

Bakerlaw recently posted about the Ontario Superior Court of Justice’s decision in Canada Without Poverty v AG Canada, 2018 ONSC 4147, in which the Court struck down a prohibition in the Income Tax Act preventing registered charities from devoting more than 10% of their resources to “political activities”. You can read our blog post here (link).

On August 15th, 2018, the federal government released a statement indicating that it would be appealing the decision. The statement can be found here (link).

Because of the government’s appeal, the Canada Without Poverty decision is unlikely to be the final word on freedom of expression and charities’ sponsorship of non-partisan political activities.

However, the statement also promised that the appeal “will not change the policy direction the Government intends to take with respect to the removal of quantitative limits on political activities”.

Instead, the federal government committed to implementing Recommendation 3 of the Report of the Consultation Panel on the Political Activities of Charities.

To meet this recommendation, the government has committed to “explicitly allow charities to fully engage without limitation in non-partisan public policy dialogue”, provided this political activity furthers the organization’s charitable purposes. You can read the Report and its recommendations here (link).

Related: , , , ,